Let’s break down the leading software development methodologies that teams are using this year.
1.
WaterfallOne of the oldest SDLC models, Waterfall is a sequential, phase-based methodology. Teams complete one phase—like planning, development, or testing—before moving to the next.
- Pros: Clear documentation, predictable outcomes, easy to manage
- Cons: Inflexible, not ideal for evolving requirements
- Best for: Government, construction, or enterprise projects with fixed scope
2.
AgileAgile software development is an iterative approach that emphasizes flexibility, collaboration, and customer feedback. Work is delivered in small, usable increments over short cycles (called sprints).
- Pros: Fast iterations, continuous improvement, adaptable to change
- Cons: Requires high team collaboration, can be harder to manage at scale
- Best for: SaaS, startups, evolving products
3.
ScrumScrum is a framework under the Agile umbrella. It organizes work into time-boxed sprints (usually 2–4 weeks) with daily standups, sprint reviews, and retrospectives.
- Pros: High visibility, structured workflow, team ownership
- Cons: May not suit long-term, large-scale projects
- Best for: Cross-functional teams focused on rapid delivery
4.
KanbanKanban uses a visual board to manage tasks and workflow. It promotes continuous delivery without fixed iterations.
- Pros: Flexible, transparent, good for support/maintenance teams
- Cons: Less focus on planning and deadlines
- Best for: Ongoing tasks, DevOps, service-based teams
5.
Lean Software DevelopmentInspired by lean manufacturing, this methodology focuses on eliminating waste, improving efficiency, and delivering value quickly.
- Pros: Faster delivery, reduced bottlenecks
- Cons: Requires disciplined teams and mature processes
- Best for: MVPs, startups, customer-driven development
6.
DevOpsDevOps methodology bridges the gap between development and operations, promoting automation, CI/CD pipelines, and faster deployments.
- Pros: Speeds up releases, improves collaboration, supports scalability
- Cons: Requires cultural and technical shift
- Best for: Cloud-native apps, enterprise DevSecOps, large-scale systems
7.
Rapid Application Development (RAD)RAD prioritizes quick prototyping with constant user feedback. It’s ideal for applications that must evolve quickly.
- Pros: Fast delivery, user-centered, flexible
- Cons: Less focus on scalability or structure
- Best for: MVPs, UX-driven apps, internal tools
8.
Extreme Programming (XP)XP focuses on code quality and technical excellence. Practices include test-driven development (TDD), pair programming, and frequent releases.
- Pros: Clean code, strong testing, developer discipline
- Cons: High learning curve, may slow down initial pace
- Best for: Mission-critical systems, startups with skilled devs